The consequences dell’bomb interview granted by the prince Harry e Meghan Markle a Oprah Winfrey vanno beyond any fatal (for the Crown) forecast. L’Australia – a federal constitutional monarchy that has Queen Elizabeth as head of state, has just made it known, through the voice of her Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull, which means cut ties with the British Crown: «Our country must become a Republic. Our head of state should be an Australian citizen, not the queen of the UK. ‘
Turnbull admitted that Queen Elizabeth “is very popular” in Australia, ma when Charles ascends the throne “the time for change will come”.
Buckingham Palace is increasingly in the eye of the storm. Especially for the accusations of racism launched by Harry and Meghan who have bounced around the world forcing Her Majesty to initiate a court investigation: “Memories can varySaid the queen in her very conciliatory reply to the Sussexes, but “they will be taken very seriously by the royal family and dealt with privately”. In the meantime, however, many voices are being raised in the United Kingdom in defense of the Palace. And many question several statements by the former actress.
Meghan, for example, said that no one helped her to deal with her entry into the royal family. “It’s not true”, swears a source al Daily Mail. “Buckingham Palace had provided you with an experienced and loyal staff. But she and Harry didn’t listen to anyone. ‘ The queen, according to the insider, had enlisted her most trusted advisor, Samantha Cohen, to help Meghan prepare for the royal wedding and entry into life at court“. However, Meghan, who also called Queen Elizabeth “wonderful”, claimed that she had not received any guidance on how to behave in the new role of duchess.
Markle later complained that after she entered the court she had been deprived of her passport and driving license. That would only be returned to her after the Megxit. The storico Robert Lacey, consultant of the Netflix series The Crown, made it clear to the BBC that no one wanted to hurt or spite her. Those measures had been taken, as protocol dictates, simply for protect it: “If she had gone out alone, behind the wheel of a car, she wouldn’t have been safe.” As for the passport, “it is assumed that the documents of all members of the royal family are kept in safes guarded by the security of the Palace.” Meghan in her story on TV she made believe she was “trapped and isolated”. In fact he was dealing with “simple routine measures, and he probably would have had access to any of his documents if he wished. ‘
Even the history of the Harry and Meghan’s secret wedding has aroused controversy. Markle told Oprah that, three days before the royal wedding celebrated in Windsor on May 18, 2018 and followed on TV by millions of viewers, they called the Archbishop of Canterbury to ask him to celebrate an intimate wedding in the garden of their home. The Duchess of Sussex explained that it was an exchange of vows in which only she, Prince Harry and the Archbishop were present. That secret wedding But – as the British royal reporters immediately pointed out – it has no legal value. For the secret “yes” to be official, there was a need for witnesses and other permits that Meghan and Harry, for their exchange of votes, did not even ask for. According to some royal observers, Markle’s televised tale was another slap in the face of the queen and the royal family, because it served a single purpose: to belittle the fabulous marriage that had consecrated them to the royal couple of the decade.
In the Sussex interview there are many dark spots that are making rivers of ink spill. But at the roots of the many, there is one that puzzles most: where the desire for privacy of the Duchess ended? Meghan Markle in the past few months has launched a crusade, in the name of his violated privacy, against the British tabloids. And last February won the legal battle against the Daily Mail and the Mail on Sunday, the two British tabloids from her cited in court for having invaded his privacy publishing excerpts from the private letter sent to dad Thomas in August 2018. It is logical that many real observers now point out that there is somehypocrisy in invoking confidentiality only to then feed himself to the queen of personal interviews.
Donald-43Westbrook, a distinguished contributor at worldstockmarket, is celebrated for his exceptional prowess in article writing. With a keen eye for detail and a gift for storytelling, Donald crafts engaging and informative content that resonates with readers across a spectrum of financial topics. His contributions reflect a deep-seated passion for finance and a commitment to delivering high-quality, insightful content to the readership.
