untitled design

Big Brother Vip 6, Alfonso Signorini: «The sentence on abortion? You have not evaluated the context “

A little more than 48 hours from the final of the edition of Big Brother Vip longest ever, Alfonso Signorini entrusts the Corriere della Sera a balance of his second experience as a solo conductor, choosing to go back to talking about the (many) controversies that have set fire to the House in the last six months, including the very unhappy joke that he himself said directly about abortion, towards which “we are opposed in all its forms”. A phrase that has aroused various controversies not so much for the position, which may or may not be shared, but for that “we” that inevitably made the public think that all production and the network agreed with him.

seraphim of gregorio

«I was talking about Giucas Casella’s bitch inside the Gf. A joke was extrapolated and it became a case. The context must also be evaluated “Signorini defended himself, also talking about the decidedly softer line than the Big Brother has chosen to adopt this year towards competitors, subscribing to racist and homophobic releases often too lightly. «It cannot be done with GF a champion of correctness, it is a program by its nature politically incorrect; the direct one cannot be sweetened nor can one give a vision of reality different from what it is. In previous editions we were more rigorous and inflexible, and there were frictions and conflicts in the working group. To me, for example, the disqualification of Fausto Leali for the N-word seemed exaggerated and out of place », said Alfonso Signorini, without denying that there have been several slips in this lap.

“This year some expressions have been decidedly out of place and we have always strongly condemned them, but we know what is truly insulting from what is provocative, fruit of exasperation or stupidity. Then the social networks transform everything into a national case, but if we only reasoned with the politically correct we would not even have to go on the air 24 hours a day “. The question is thorny and capable of always raising a discussion: safeguarding a program from the risk of politically correct by granting a “free all” to competitors is not too convenient a solution by a production that, by doing so, shakes off possible responsibilities? Is it possible that we cannot evaluate case by case and consequently take the most correct measure so that even the public from home can realize that certain words should never be pronounced on live TV? It remains that, even in this round, for better or for worse, the Big Brother has been talked about and, perhaps, this is what really matters for those who sit behind the desk.

To receive the other cover of Vanity Fair (and much more), subscribe to Vanity Weekend.

Content

This content can also be viewed on the site it originates from.

Source: Vanity Fair

You may also like

Get the latest

Stay Informed: Get the Latest Updates and Insights

 

Most popular