Bride and groom allow pets at their wedding but children NOT and cause controversy

Currently, the debate about bringing children to weddings or banning them has become the biggest destroyer of families after the fights over the grounds at Christmas. In this sense, prepare your arguments because at Alice and David’s wedding they do not accept minors but they do accept pets.

All the “demsadre” started when the user Pavel Gaona shared the invitation to the wedding in question, with which a part of the population lost their minds, another went to buy his tie for “pugberto” and many others were disassociated thinking about their Infonavit points.

Meme sir fighting and another sitting

The reason? The clarification that the event is pet friendly (that accept pets) and not kids friendly (they do not accept children). This small indication worked as a second invitation to the opinions of Twitter users, who always have something to say. These are some examples.

‘Imagine listening to the barking of dogs, oh no’; ‘Better to hear barking than children screaming uncontrollably’; ‘All the dogs shitting on the dance floor’; ‘Your wedding, your decision’.

After the time invested and the many fights that the event led to, the couple decided to cancel their marriage and, instead, organize a wedding for the deluded people who believed this statement. Obviously, nothing happened, everyone just went on with their lives.

It is worth mentioning that Pável confessed in the comments area that he is not one of the guests at the party and that, in fact, he does not even know if it is a real celebration, so possibly someone did it with the intention of generating controversy. And he did it.

Source: Okchicas

You may also like