The Federal Council of Medicine (CFM) published on Monday (12) a note criticizing a resolution authorizing biologists to perform aesthetic and injectable procedures. According to the entity, the norm is “a blatant invasion of medical attributions.”
Resolution No. 734/2025, published on May 7 in the Federal Official Gazette by the Federal Council of Biology (CFBio), regulates the use of injectable aesthetic procedures and aesthetic procedures by qualified biologists in aesthetic biology.
The resolution establishes that Biologist Estata is authorized to perform injectable aesthetic procedures and techniques, provided that it is duly qualified, with certifications recognized by the Ministry of Education (MEC). Allowed procedures include: intradermotherapy with fillers and bioestimulators, mesotherapy, micro -aging, cell and regenerative therapy, trichology, application of botulinum toxin, peim (injectable aesthetic procedure for microvasos), PDO wires use and ozoniotherapy.
The new standard also disciplines the prescription of products for internal use in centers and aesthetic clinics, allowing the indication of substances such as vitamins, minerals, amino acids, bioflavonoids, enzymes, peptides, type A and others classified as cosmetics, nutraceuticals and dermocosmetic, provided that with adequate technical foundation and within the ethical limits of. profession.
Read the full resolution here.
CFM says biologists “have no competence to perform medical act”
In the note released on Monday (12), the CFM states that biologists have no competence to perform medical act such as aesthetic procedures.
“The CFM vehemently repudiates this resolution, which puts the health of the population at risk by allowing non -doctors, without adequate formation, to perform invasive procedures in patients. The autarchy will take all appropriate measures to suspend the standard – as already occurred in 2023, with similar measure adopted by CFBio (Resolution No. 582/2020),” says José Hiran Gallo, president of the CFM, in the note.
In addition, the CFM states that the acts provided for in CFBio’s resolution “enter activities attributed as private doctors and do not fit the provision of the law that regulates the profession of biologist.” According to the note, the standard is “an invasion of private competence of doctors”, provided for in Law No. 12.842/2013, known as the Law of the Medical Act, which establishes the private acts of doctors.
Read the full note below:
THE CNN He contacted CFBio to request the position on the CFM repudiation grade, but until the publication of this matter did not obtain return. The text will be updated with the position of the entity, if any.
What aesthetic procedures are released in pregnancy and breastfeeding?
This content was originally published in CFM disputes a standard that authorizes biologists to do aesthetic procedures on the CNN Brazil website.
Source: CNN Brasil
I am an experienced journalist and writer with a career in the news industry. My focus is on covering Top News stories for World Stock Market, where I provide comprehensive analysis and commentary on markets around the world. I have expertise in writing both long-form articles and shorter pieces that deliver timely, relevant updates to readers.
