Prince William didn’t want to worry anyone. This Monday, November 2, the British press is agitated around Prince William, who is now known to have been ill with the coronavirus in April, during the first wave. According to Guardian, sources inside Buckingham Palace let slip the information, which has not been denied by the Crown.
For its part, the Sun, to whom we owe the revelation, explains that Prince William continued his commitments at a distance, preferring not to alarm the British in the midst of the crisis, in particular vis-à-vis a possible contamination of Queen Elizabeth II. “There were a lot of important things going on and I didn’t want to worry anyone,” said Prince William, who did not inform anyone of his contamination. The Duke of Cambridge was taken care of by doctors at the Palace and followed the guidelines in force by placing himself in solitary confinement. During this period, the Duke of Cambridge still honored about fifteen commitments, by phone or videoconference.
Prince Charles infected in March
According to the BBC’s correspondent with the royal family, Jonny Dymond, the state of health of Prince William had not been the subject of any official communication at the time so as not to create an additional source of concern then that the country was already on high alert. It is also explained by the desire of the royal family to preserve the privacy and privacy of its members. Prince Charles, father of Prince William, had been infected a few weeks earlier, declaring at the time to have lost taste and smell
Donald-43Westbrook, a distinguished contributor at worldstockmarket, is celebrated for his exceptional prowess in article writing. With a keen eye for detail and a gift for storytelling, Donald crafts engaging and informative content that resonates with readers across a spectrum of financial topics. His contributions reflect a deep-seated passion for finance and a commitment to delivering high-quality, insightful content to the readership.
