Brothers and partners, Emicida and Evandro Fióti, break partnership and begin court battle for the control of producer Lab Ghost. The dispute, which came to public last Friday (28), revolves around accusations of diversion of money, irregular management and breach of confidence . The process runs at the 2nd Business Court and Arbitration Conflicts of São Paulo.
Evandro Fióti claims to have been removed from the administration of the LAB Ghost unilaterally by Emicida, despite a prior agreement signed in December 2024 that provided for the company’s egalitarian division. He claims that his financial transfers they were transparent and agreed denying any Detour . Emicida, in turn, accuses her brother to perform Unauthorized withdrawals and transfers in the approximate value of R $ 6 million .
The rapper says he acted to protect the company from Risk of patrimonial emptying and other supposed irregularities. He points breach of confidence and attempt to gain improper advantage by the brother. Fióti, on the other hand, maintains that Emicida failed to comply with the corporate division agreement and prevented him from exercising his corporate rights .
Experts analyze case
Specialists in corporate and family law heard by CNN analyzed the legal aspects of the case. The validity of the prior agreement, called “Term Sheet “Although not formalized, it is one of the points of discussion. About this, the corporate law expert Vanderlei Garcia Jr explains how the contractual instrument works.
“The so -called Term Sheet or Memorandum of Understandings, even though it is not a definitive contract, can have legal force, especially if there is proof that the parties have acted based on that agreement,” explains Garcia Jr.
Another crucial point of the discussion occurs in the legality of the revocation of the Fióti power of attorney and the blocking of its access to the company’s accounts. Kevin de Sousa, a specialist in Family Law and Successions, analyzed the case.
“The majority partner, especially if the formal administrator appointed in the social contract, has broad prerogatives to make decisions in defense of the company. However, the revocation of a partner’s power of attorney and blocking his access to society information must have objective and proportional justification,” explains Kevin.
THE Management of LAB Ghost During the court dispute is also a point of attention, and was questioned by the report to the experts.
“When there is a risk of prejudice to the continuation of the company’s activities or evidence of mismanagement, the court may appoint a provisional judicial administrator,” said Kevin.
Rights and Responsibilities of Partners
The dispute raises questions about Rights and Responsibilities of one majority partner and one minority partner.
“The majority partner, by stopping more quotas, has greater decision-making power in social deliberations. However, he has no white letter to act in a way that harms the interests of society or other partners,” says Garcia Jr.
In the view of the experts, the influence of artistic partnership Between Emicida and the ghost lab in conflict resolution is also a factor to consider.
“When the company’s identity is directly linked to the image or career of a partner, corporate dispute gains more complex contours,” says Kevin.
Positions
In a statement, Fióti denied the accusations of deviation, stating that all his actions were transparent and within the company’s procedures. He claims that Emicida received even higher values, including profit distribution.
Lab Ghost, in turn, reinforced its connection with the career of Emicida and highlighted Fióti’s performance in the representation of the rapper’s artistic interests.
THE CNN He tried to contact Emicida’s defense, but got no return.
This content was originally published in Emicida accuses brother of diverting $ 6 million; Understand the fight in court on CNN Brazil.
Source: CNN Brasil
I’m James Harper, a highly experienced and accomplished news writer for World Stock Market. I have been writing in the Politics section of the website for over five years, providing readers with up-to-date and insightful information about current events in politics. My work is widely read and respected by many industry professionals as well as laymen.
