On November 25, the Court of Assizes of Milan sentenced ALLE ALESSANDRO IMPREGNATIELLOthe former barman, a confessing guilty of the murder of the partner Giulia Tramontanopregnant in the seventh month, killed on May 27, 2023. Not an impetus murder, but premeditated. The Court recognized the aggravating circumstances of the sentimental bond, premeditation and cruelty. On Wednesday 25 June we go on appeal and the lawyers of Impigniello will try to change this reading to try to eliminate the aggravating circumstances that have been recognized at first instance.
The reconstruction of one of the most heinous news cases of recent years. Alessandro Impigniello confessed that he killed his partner, pregnant in the seventh month of pregnancy
In the appeal of the lawyer Giulia Geradini, the defense asks that the aggravating circumstances of premeditation and cruelty fail. Generic mitigating people are recognized. Impigniello is described as a non -cruel man, but overwhelmed by his bugie castle. For lawyers it is not a premeditated murder. “Impigniello is not cruel, he just wanted to kill the fetus.” The point would have been the pregnancy not accepted by man, there would have been no desire to kill the partner.
The defense document is reconstructed the day of 27 May 2023 That of the meeting between Giulia and the other woman in the life of Impagnatiello. This is the moment when the bugie castle collapses, in which its attempt to keep two parallel lives standing ends.
These are details that tell even more the horror of the killing of the 29 -year -old who took place on May 27, 2023, when he was pregnant in the seventh month

For the defense there is no premeditation, but a coarse and clumsy conduct. It would not be a premeditated murder, everything would be done later: the purchase of petrol to eliminate the body, that of the trolley to transport the corpse on May 30, the topicide, however administered in the previous months, left in sight. Also according to the defenders of the former barman, research on mice poison focuses “always and exclusively on the fetus as, the aim was to cause the abortion of the sunset and not cause it to death”.
The problem is the child not yet born, “obstacle for his career, for his life, for the purchase of the future house and for the relationship with Tramontano. If in his heart he would have liked to interrupt the pregnancy, the perfect image that the accused has always wanted to give of himself, in relation to his personality sections, did not allow him “.
The aggravating circumstance of cruelty is also eliminated for defense e Impigniello would have the right to generic attenuating because “he immediately showed his repentance and apologies to the victim’s family. During the trial, he did not escape a long and articulated exam in which he expressed all his fragility, making a lucid analysis of the conduct held against the sunset, putting himself bare about the immense castle of bugie built of which he was overwhelmed “.
The sentence could arrive already on Wednesday 25 June.
Source: Vanity Fair

I’m Susan Karen, a professional writer and editor at World Stock Market. I specialize in Entertainment news, writing stories that keep readers informed on all the latest developments in the industry. With over five years of experience in creating engaging content and copywriting for various media outlets, I have grown to become an invaluable asset to any team.