Nor of Alberto Stasithe only one definitively sentenced for the crime, nor of Andrea Sempliothe new suspect in the investigation of the Pavia Prosecutor’s Office. As reported by theHandlefrom the oral buffer of Chiara Poggitaken 18 years ago and never analyzed so far, During the evidentiary accident, a minimal amount of male DNA belonging would have been identified to a man not yet identified.
It is not a definitive fact. According to what is learned from the consultants of the parties, the exam will be repeated because the quantity of genetic profile would be minimal. It is not excluded that it could be a contamination, but if it were not so it would be a sensational turning point because it would place more people on the crime scene.
The sample was detected on the “gauze” used by the coroner Marco Ballardini to withdraw the victim’s oral buffer. In 2007 this genetic material was not analyzed as it happened for what has been recovered in the intimate parts of Chiara where there was no genetic material.
The experts, in the new evidentiary accident, have isolated genetic material on the acetate of an imprint found “on the internal surface of the fixed door of the kitchen door”. The imprint is not bloody and would not belong to stasis or to always.
According to the Pavia Prosecutor’s Office, which reopened, starting from this, the investigation, on the genetic material found on the nails of Chiara Poggi there would be the Semdio DNA and another unidentified male, but it would be in more limited proportions.
In an interview al Daily The mother and father of the killed girl tell details on those days when the son Marco was with them. «From March we have been catapulted into an even worse situation than that of 18 years ago. I hope it ends everything soon “
The Poggi family remains on the positions. “There are no DNA of unknown subjects on the crime scene and obviously much less on Chiara’s body”. As reported by theHandlefor the lawyer Tizzoni, it is “a fact that as far as we can know is totally dismissed from any foundation and which once again denotes how, in the absence of alternative objective feedback to the procedural truth ascertained and which has identified stasis as manager, it proposes unfounded hypotheses”.
Source: Vanity Fair
I’m Susan Karen, a professional writer and editor at World Stock Market. I specialize in Entertainment news, writing stories that keep readers informed on all the latest developments in the industry. With over five years of experience in creating engaging content and copywriting for various media outlets, I have grown to become an invaluable asset to any team.
