A frequent refrain of conservatives who get excited in the weeks following theannulment of the sentence Roe vs Wade it goes more or less like this: “Abortion has not been outlawed, the Supreme Court is only returning the decision to the states. Do not become hysterical! ». Technically it is true, in practice this argument is, of course, a real nonsense. Abortion has been restricted in about half of the country, eight states banned the medical procedure on the day of the sentence Roe and 13 states will ban it within 30 days of the June 24 ruling. If someone tries to argue that the court’s decision isn’t all that important and doesn’t change much, you are legally obligated to inform him that he has sawdust for brains. If you can breathe the same air with them for a moment longer, you should also inform them of the many ways in which the various states in question have proceeded to use the opportunity offered to them by the Supreme Court to support not only forced births, but also the murder of pregnant persons authorized by the state.
Over the weekend, the Republican Party of Idaho voted against adopting an amendment that would add an exception to its official abortion policy for cases where a mother’s life needs to be saved. Scott Herndon, Republican in the running for a seat in the State Senate, he argued before the delegates: “In the last 49 years we have essentially lost in the debate because we have focused on abortion as an interruption of pregnancy and not as the interruption of a living human being”.
He then added: “We will never win this human rights issue, the most important of our time, if we make concessions for the intentional killing of another human being.” Obviously he didn’t point out that even denying life-saving treatment to a pregnant person, knowing they might die, is a deliberate killing, because this would apparently require too much reflection on his part. The decision not to add an exception to abortion to save the mother’s life was made 412 versus 164; as theIndependentthe party platform “is used to direct politics within the state legislature controlled by the GOP (the republican party ed)”.
Currently, the reads Idaho “trigger”, approved in 2020, bans abortion with exceptions for rape and incest, but only if the crimes are reported to law enforcement. (The Idaho Republican Party platform has no exceptions for rape or incest; a regional Planned Parenthood organization and an Idaho abortionist association have sued to block the law, and a hearing is scheduled for. August 3).
According to Newsweek, in a Facebook video after the Supreme Court ruling, Herndon has declared“An innocent child is not put to death for his father’s crime, but this is what this law would allow.” She also said that such exceptions give women “a pass” and said that “if a mother really wants to kill her baby, she can lie, say she was raped, file a police report and go and have her baby killed. in the State of Idaho and no one will be prosecuted. ‘ “Because Herndon apparently wanted to make it clear that not only is he against abortion, but he is also a colossal idiot. (On his website about him, he claims to “Believe in the conservation and protection of human life” and to “have followed this principle with words and deeds, as an active abolitionist of abortion and supporter of firearms” … We believe that no, do not see the irony).
Among other reports of the dire repercussions of the Supreme Court simply remitting the abortion issue to the states, a woman bled for more than 10 days after undergoing an incomplete abortion because a Wisconsin hospital refused to perform the procedure; a woman with an ectopic pregnancy had to seek emergency care abroad because a doctor of the his country of origin he was afraid of running into the law; Kansas hospital administrators have temporarily requested “pharmacist approval” before prescribing drugs that stop postpartum bleeding because they are sometimes also used to abort; and a 10-year-old rape victim in Ohio was told that had to give to light her rapist’s son or seek treatment elsewhere.
Twitter content
This content can also be viewed on the site it originates from.
There’s more. Ted Cruz also wants to overturn the ruling on same-sex marriage. Fortunately for the Texan senator, human marriage is gelatinous tubular worms is not in question, otherwise he and Heidi they should start thinking about moving abroad. According to CNN: «Obergefell (the sentence that gave the right to marriage between same-sex couples ed), as Roe v. Wade, ha ignored two centuries of our nation’s history, ”Cruz said in a clip posted on his YouTube channel for his podcast:“ Marriage has always been a matter left to states. We have seen that before Obergefell some states were moving to allow gay marriage, others to allow civil unions. There were different standards that states were adopting ”. And he added: “The way in which the Constitution provides that this position can be advanced is to convince one’s fellow citizens, and if one succeeds in convincing one’s fellow citizens, the state will change the laws to reflect these views. In Obergefell, the court said: “No, we know better than you, and now every state must, must sanction and allow gay marriage.” I think that decision was clearly wrong when it was made, “said Cruz,” the court exaggerated.
In June, in an opinion agreed on Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health, the case that the Court used as a pretext to overturn the Roe, the judge Clarence Thomas has written that the court’s team of conservatives should now consider eliminating sentences protecting contraception, same-sex marriage and same-sex sexual activity. So this is not just a shot in the arm for Cruz, but a real and concrete threat. No, really: Imagine it!
-The Stories We Are: Letter to my abortion partner
-The right denied: investigation into abortion in Italy
Source: Vanity Fair
