Radeon RX 6600M is still available only in one laptop – HP Omen 16 – which did not prevent the first test of this adapter from appearing on the Web. The author of the review did not name the laptop, but it is unlikely that this is some other model.
The testing turned out to be quite voluminous, which allows us to compare the new AMD product with the GeForce RTX 3060 and RTX 3050 Ti. At the same time, the TGP of the Radeon adapter was 100-120 W, the RTX 3060 was 115-130 W, and the RTX 3050 Ti was 80-95 W.
In Full HD resolution, for which the negotiated adapters are best suited, the RX 6600M performs on a par with the RTX 3060. In none of the test games did any of these cards have a tangible advantage, so in general the adapters are equal. albeit with the slight advantage of an Nvidia card. As for the RTX 3050 Ti, it is one step lower and is inferior to the new AMD product by about 15-20%. At 2K resolution, the RTX 3060’s advantage over its competitor grows to an average of 13%.
With ray tracing enabled, of course, the RTX 3060 feels much better, 37% off the AMD card. At the same time, interestingly, the RTX 3050 Ti starts to lag behind the RX 6600M more (by 30-40%), and it is not yet clear why. Perhaps this card already has too few RT blocks, so the less efficient blocks in the Radeon adapter take their toll.
In mining, AMD’s new product shows a result of 27.6 MH / s versus 40.3 MH / s for the RTX 3060 and 34 MH / s for its predecessor, the RX 5600M. That is, such an adapter is unlikely to be of interest to miners.
.
Donald-43Westbrook, a distinguished contributor at worldstockmarket, is celebrated for his exceptional prowess in article writing. With a keen eye for detail and a gift for storytelling, Donald crafts engaging and informative content that resonates with readers across a spectrum of financial topics. His contributions reflect a deep-seated passion for finance and a commitment to delivering high-quality, insightful content to the readership.
