The choice of a life far from Royal Family is now definitive for the Prince Harry, result of rebellion to the predestined role of Spare assigned to him at birth as second son, although there is those who think that the Duke of Sussex has always had everything alone in his head, and that his family has never considered him as a spare wheel.
The Duchess of Sussex on the occasion of the Women’s Day posted a new image of the second son on Instagram, this time portrayed on a boat and curled up in the arms of Dad Harry, who kisses her on her neck
According to the real biographer Ingrid seward, director of the magazine Majesty, who spoke with Fox News, Harry’s problems would be born from the too indulgent education he received, especially from his father. “If Carlo had been more stopped with Harry – and, to a certain extent, with William – in their years of training, perhaps they would not have caused so many concerns”. In short, Carlo would have been “Too indulgent” With his son, allowing him to do whatever he wanted.
In Spare, Harry claims to have been born to become his brother’s shadow: «I was brought to the world in case something happened to Willy. I was born to provide support, distraction, diversion and, if necessary, a spare part. A kidney, perhaps. A blood transfusion. A grain of bone marrow ».
Seward had already mentioned the question in his most recent book My Mother and I, In which he rejects Harry’s story, writing: “This is completely false, but it is how Harry has chosen to see himself, and has allowed this perception to dominate his life, to the point that he has now made a career”. In short, Harry would have chosen to be a victimpouring his hatred towards the family and above all towards William.
That Harry and William grew up with a certain freedom is known, especially thanks to Lady Diana, who for children wanted a childhood that was as normal as possible. When the princess died, the ex -husband tried not to deprive them of that freestyle they had known until then, which, perhaps, today is a little repentant. “I think that Carlo probably regretted not having been a little more severe, because he could have given both guys some more limits “added Ingrid Seward speaking with Fox News.
Unlike Diana, always spontaneous in games and granting, Carlo has always been less good at expressing his feelings. Among the things that Harry reproached him openly, for example, there is a lack of affection, hugs above all. After all, Carlo had not been taught to Carlo, difficult to put into practice something he did not know with children: the same relationship with Elizabeth II would consolidate himself only during his adult life, given that as a child he had spent most of his time with the nanny.
Apparently, King Carlo, who is a passionate beekeeper, would be “decidedly too busy”, while the prince and princess of Wales would be equally selfless
Beyond the recriminations, always unsuccessful, the relationships between father and son today remain distant. The king’s illness seemed to have brought them closer, but for months the two have not seen each other and it is not clear if they usually feel. Meanwhile, Royal Family would be completely disinterested in the Meghan show broadcast on Netflix, made a spokesman for the sovereign know. “It is too busy”: the same official response also given those few times that the son has returned to London after the transfer to America.
Source: Vanity Fair
I’m Susan Karen, a professional writer and editor at World Stock Market. I specialize in Entertainment news, writing stories that keep readers informed on all the latest developments in the industry. With over five years of experience in creating engaging content and copywriting for various media outlets, I have grown to become an invaluable asset to any team.
