Malcolm X: Man Wrongfully Convicted of His Murder Seeks $40 Million in Compensation

Mohammad Al Aziz who was wrongly accused of killing Malcolm X on USA and stayed in prison for a long time, he is going to ask compensation and in fact amounting to 40 million dollars.

According to washingtonpost.comthe man he stayed in prison for 20 yearswhile acquitted in 2021. So his lawyers filed the suit on Thursday in US District Court in Brooklyn, marking the start of a potentially lengthy battle to secure financial compensation for the 84-year-old who was at his home on February 21, 1965, when the historic murder occurred. in the Bronx and was being treated for a leg injury.

In an emotional hearing The court formally acquitted Aziz last November, 55 years after the crime, with then-Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus Vance Jr. overturning his conviction.. Another innocent, Khalil Islam, was exonerated posthumously.

Μοχάμεντ ΑζίζΜοχάμεντ ΑζίζMohammed Aziz
Mohammad Al Aziz when he was arrested for the assassination of Malcolm X

“As a result of his wrongful conviction and imprisonment, Mr. Aziz spent 20 years in prison for a crime he did not commit while spending 55 years in the suffering and indignity of being wrongly labeled as the convicted murderer of one of the most important civil rights leaders in history.Aziz’s attorneys, David Sanis and Deborah Francois, wrote in a 59-page civil complaint.

Aziz was a 26-year-old father of six when he was charged with the Malcolm X murder based on corrupt practices that included witness intimidation and withholding information from NYPD and FBI investigators, lawyers said.

According to the lawsuit, the city allowed the unethical and corrupt policies on the policing agenda at the time, which led to the wrongful arrest and subsequent conviction for first-degree murder, while detectives knowingly withheld information exonerating Aziz in a hasty investigation to file a lawsuit against him.

“The presumption of probable cause created by the grand jury indictment is overcome by the fact that Mr. Aziz’s indictment was secured on the basis of police misconduct,” the complaint says, adding that poor eyewitness identification was “the central element that was presented to the jury and which almost caused the resulting indictment.”

Source: News Beast

You may also like