It is well known by now that Italian politics he takes five steps forward and then systematically takes ten steps back. The latest developments related to the Italia Viva amendments on the Zan Ddl prove this to us.
Central focus of this proposal is delete the term gender identity, together with the cancellation of article 4 on freedom of expression and the redefinition of article 7 on National day against homolesbobitransphobia, proposed changes that, for the sake of brevity, we could define as “what a fear this gender!”
The approval of the Zan Ddl should be the starting point to begin to provide more information on these issues, but the pressure of the right, the intervention of the Vatican and the request for specific changes show us that gender identity seems to be something that scares a lot of people. Instead, I would like to remember that there are other frightening things, such as cheese on spaghetti with clams, which as far as I’m concerned should be universally abolished.
Gender is something that has to do with the perception of oneself, and everything about one’s person does not necessarily link to a binary identity and can also change over time, sometimes it is a path that does not necessarily go from A to B. This is one of the aspects that the opponents of the Zan law they have a hard time understanding and that they often approach the phantom “gender ideology”.
Gender identity is not a fairy tale made up to tear the world apart as we know it, all of this has always existed. This is demonstrated by the lives of people who, because of their gender, sexual orientation or their body, have suffered every evil, including death.
Our culture has founded its foundations on gender binarism, bringing with it a whole series of constructs linked to roles and stereotypes considered “natural”, including those around women, which often produce the most vulgar sexism. Deciding to make those changes will affect all gender issues, effectively wiping out misogyny as well as hate crime.
And if in the meantime gender identity and sexual orientation continue to be the subject of discussion in Parliament, the only aspect of the law that no one seems to complain about is that of disability.
In this regard, if one part of me is clearly relieved, another is not surprising at all. When it comes to defending people with disabilities, the government always seems ready to intervene, but never to evolve. Everything that protects us is always welcome by a state that has always and only seen us as subjects of care, it is when we decide to self-determine and ask for rights for our autonomy that problems arise. It is no coincidence that we do not have a serious program on independent living nationwide and we are still fighting for legal euthanasia. The way in which the modification of the Zan Ddl on gender identity is being forced shows once again what they are people considered “dangerous” and as “harmless”.
What should be understood, however, is that eliminating gender identity from the equation has the same effect as that famous game of our childhood, the one where there were a series of stacked wooden bricks and you had to remove one at a time without dropping. the others. Here, gender identity it is a fundamental brick that if removed causes the whole tower to collapse.
Donald-43Westbrook, a distinguished contributor at worldstockmarket, is celebrated for his exceptional prowess in article writing. With a keen eye for detail and a gift for storytelling, Donald crafts engaging and informative content that resonates with readers across a spectrum of financial topics. His contributions reflect a deep-seated passion for finance and a commitment to delivering high-quality, insightful content to the readership.
