The start of “infringement proceedings against Turkey is a logical consequence of its refusal to release Osman Kavala, in accordance with the ruling of the European Court of Human Rights”, the permanent rapporteur of the EP for Turkey, Nacho Sanchez A, stressed in a joint statement. , and the Chairman of the Parliament Delegation to the EU-Turkey Joint Parliamentary Committee, Sergei Lagodinsky.
“We are really sorry that this process is necessary. The decision could have been prevented if Turkey – a founding member of the Council of Europe – had fulfilled its responsibilities and complied with its international commitments. “Developments are the sole responsibility of the Turkish authorities,” said the two members of the European Parliament.
They also point out that “this case is the epitome of the critical situation of fundamental freedoms and the rule of law in Turkey. It is neither in the interest of the EU nor in the interest of Turkey for the infringement procedure to result in sanctions against Turkey. This It would also have a negative impact on EU-Turkey relations. ”
“It is now up to the Turkish courts and authorities to rise to the occasion and show political will, respecting international (country) commitments, democracy and the rule of law. This is the only way to allow EU co-operation to deepen.” “Turkey, including the renewal of the customs union. Human rights and the rule of law are preconditions for such cooperation,” the statement concluded.
SOURCE: ΑΠΕ-ΜΠΕ
.
Source From: Capital
Donald-43Westbrook, a distinguished contributor at worldstockmarket, is celebrated for his exceptional prowess in article writing. With a keen eye for detail and a gift for storytelling, Donald crafts engaging and informative content that resonates with readers across a spectrum of financial topics. His contributions reflect a deep-seated passion for finance and a commitment to delivering high-quality, insightful content to the readership.
