The entrepreneur considers it necessary clear legal differences between digital securities, goods and tokens, especially in situations where securities can be tokenized:
“Under what circumstances can the securities be tocenize, what is digital security as an asset without an issuer? There is no answer. The lack of clarity creates regulatory confusion and displaces innovations outside the country. ”
According to Seilor, many tokens still remain in the “legal gray zone”, especially in terms of classification in accordance with the legislation on US securities.
Business cannot understand how to legally tocenize assets or release its own cryptocurrencies. If you introduce clear standards, companies will be able to emit tokens without fear of claims on the part of the US Securities and Exchange Commission (Sec) and other regulators, the businessman is sure.
Earlier, Michael Saylor proposed to the Federal Housing Administration of the United States (FHFA) to allow the use of the first cryptocurrency as the subject of the deposit when issuing mortgage loans.
Source: Bits

I am an experienced journalist, writer, and editor with a passion for finance and business news. I have been working in the journalism field for over 6 years, covering a variety of topics from finance to technology. As an author at World Stock Market, I specialize in finance business-related topics.