Murder of Garlasco, the lawyer of Chiara Poggi’s brother ironizes on the assumption of the assassin: “We only miss the satanic sects”

A dry replica arrives to the lawyer Massimo Lovati, lawyer of Andrea Semplionew suspect for the murder of Chiara Poggi, killed in Garlasco on 13 August 2007, who launched The hypothesis of a commissioned assassin.

Francesco companion, lawyer of the Poggi family, contradicts him with a sharp irony: “I don’t see anything serious. There are only the satanic sects and diverted secret services».

Lovati, who intervened to Italian stories on Rai1 and then interviewed by Fanpage.it, He said: “I’ve always said it: It was an assassin that killed Chiara Poggi. I do not speak as a lawyer, but as a criminologist or as a normal citizen who has his own idea ». A belief that had matured, specifies, well before taking the defense of Andrea Seveio in 2016. And his position did not change even in front of the definitive sentence of Alberto Stasi, ex -boyfriend of Chiara, at 16 years of imprisonment (Today in semi -freedom): “For me stasis is innocent, as is a semium».

His thesis, however, openly denies the procedural truthaccording to which Stasi, after killing Chiara, would return home, he turned on the computer to create an alibi, would have freed himself shoes dirty with blood and the crime weapon and only afterwards would he call the carabinieri.

To disassemble the hypothesis of Massimo Lovati also contributes the geneticist Marzio Caprahistorical consultant of the Poggi family, who a Fanpage He explains: «He said that perhaps Chiara was still alive. But if you believe such a thing, and it wasn’t you, try to help her, you would get dirty with blood. If you go away and you are frightening it is because you rationalized that she was dead. And above all you understand that there was a third party intervention and that it was not an accident. But above all You would call the ambulance and not the carabinieri. I call the police forces if I know someone was killed ». And again: «That is, was it a crime organized to have killed Chiara Poggi? Among other things, with an object that has not even been found and it doesn’t know what it is? Why would an assassin have to move the body down to the stairs? And again: he should also be a hired assassin by Chiara, because the sentences show that the girl knew her killer and opened the door and let the house enter. Meaning what Did a 26 -year -old girl know her assassin?».

Yet according to Massimo Lovati, already at the time of the crime there would have been macroscopic inconsistencies in the investigation into stasis. One above all: the absence of a judicial experiment to verify his story. «He would have said he played the bell, not to have received a response and to have climbed the railing. It was enough to take him to the spot and ask him where he had climbed over. If there were no footprints, it was immediately understood if they lie. A lie is not a test of guilt, but it can open alternative slopes, “he claims. And he adds: «Stasi’s shoes were clean. This, with a linear thought, means that it has not entered. Not that he returned home, he turned on the PC, threw his shoes and weapon. These are Arzigogolati thoughts. It is not a clear reasoning ».

But Lovati’s hypothesis finds no feedback in the procedural documentsas the geneticist Capra and the lawyer companion points out. And that above all, in the eyes of the Poggi family, convinced of the guilt of Chiara’s ex -boyfriend, risks transforming the tragedy into an absurd theater.

Meanwhile, the new investigation by the Pavia prosecutor’s office continues. On May 16, the hearing for the evidentiary accident is set: in the following months new genetic analyzes will be carried out on the finds still available.