Nicaragua’s “democratic legitimacy” of presidential election questioned

The Organization of American States (OAK) rigged the presidential election in Nicaragua, judging that this process was “neither free, nor fair, nor transparent”, and therefore lacks any “democratic legitimacy”.

The text of the decision of the OAK general assembly, which was approved by the votes of 25 of its 34 active Member States, emphasizes that Presidential elections “were neither free, nor fair, nor transparent, and have no democratic legitimacy”, that “Democratic institutions in Nicaragua have been severely undermined by the government” of Daniel Ortega, and how the organization asks “The release of all candidates and political prisoners”.

The countries that have signed this text call on the Standing Council, OAK’s top executive body, to make an “immediate collective assessment” by November 30th and to take “appropriate measures”.

The representative of the Nicaraguan government in the organization, Michael Campbell, reacted strongly to the decision, complaining that it is “Attack on the free, dignified and independent people of Nicaragua”.

Daniel Ortega was re-elected President of the Central American country on Sunday, for the fourth consecutive five-year term, after a vote with the absent opposition, as practically all his serious opponents were imprisoned or exiled.

The United States has welcomed the decision, with its spokesman Bradley Frieden again comparing the government of Daniel Ortega to that of Anastasia Somosa, a dictator ousted by the former Santin leader. during the 1979 revolution.

“The Inter-American Democratic Charter obliges the hemisphere to defend the democratic rights of the Nicaraguan people and we must fulfill that obligation,” he said.

Among the countries whose representatives approved yesterday’s resolution are Mexico and Bolivia.

You may also like