Prince Harry and Meghan Markle, here are all the lies they told in their docuseries

Prince Harry and Meghan Markle they promised that in the Netflix documentary Harry&Meghan they would “tell the whole truth”. Only three episodes have aired so far, and yet several of the couple’s statements have already been questioned. The first lieshave actually been revealed since the release of the first trailer, when real-life correspondent Robert Jobson unmasked the fake photos used by Harry and Meghan to denounce the intrusion of the paparazzi into their private life. Photos taken in South Africa with the consent of the Sussexes but exploited by them, in the trailer, to denounce an intrusion that never took place. Now Netflix has released the first three episodes of the docuseries. And criticisms and denials begin to rain. Here are the Sussexes’ statements that have already been questioned.

Sussex’s first meeting

In the documentary Harry and Meghan have said they met on Instagram through a mutual friend who had shared a video of the former actress. “In the end we said: let’s meet. We booked into a local, Harry was late and stuck in traffic. I immediately had a bad impression of him, I thought he had a huge ego,” Meghan said. Instead the appointment went well and the following evening they dined at the same place“That’s when I knew she was the one I was looking for,” said Harry. In the interview granted to the BBC following the announcement of their engagement in 2017, however, the Sussexes had told a completely different storyexplaining that they met during a blind date organized by a mutual friend on a midsummer night in London 2016. At this point the British press asks: what is the truth?

Royal life lessons

In the documentary Meghan claims she has had no help adjusting to real life. Neither advice nor instructions from the Palace on protocol and on everything related to public commitments. According to real sources consulted by Sunday Times it’s about a “total lie»: the staff would go out of their way to make Meghan feel comfortable and would provide a detailed dossier on all aspects of real life, inviting her to meet with several experts who could answer her questions. Meghan, however, would have agreed to see only a couple.

Royal wedding invitations

Markle claims she was forced by the Palace not to invite to the royal wedding with Harry, in May 2018, the niece she is so fond of, Ashleigh Hale. Hale is there daughter of Meghan’s half-sister, Samantha. She was adopted and raised by her paternal grandparents, but re-established relations with her biological mother in 2017. Meghan had no intention of inviting her half-sister Samantha to her wedding, who repeatedly insulted her in the press, calling her among other things a«ungrateful and ruthless social climber». But he wanted to invite his granddaughter Ashleigh. Kensington Palace officials, however, advised her not to do so: how to explain that her stepsister was not invited to the wedding, but her stepsister’s daughter was? This is the duchess’ version. Promptly denied by Palace officials, who swear they didn’t really put their mouth into the matter. Indeed, a source clarified a The Telegraph: ‘Kensington staff never told the Sussexes who they could or could not invite to their wedding.’

The comparison between Meghan and Lady Diana

In the new documentary Harry keeps comparing his wife Meghan Markle to his mother, Lady Diana. A juxtaposition severely crushed, in an interview with Fanpagesby the royal expert Anthony Capranica: «In some ways, the attempt to pass off Meghan as the new Diana is ridiculous. It’s pathetic. Diana was a really naive girl, she was 18, 19 years old and she didn’t have the slightest idea of ​​what was going to happen in her life. Ms Meghan Markle joined the royal family at 37, as a seasoned Hollywood actress and had a lot of life experience, perhaps too much ». Capranica also commented on Meghan’s farce bow to Queen Elizabeth: «Is it possible that she even ignored that it was necessary to bow to the Queen? Had no one explained to her that the Queen of England was not only Harry’s grandmother, but also the British Head of State? If no one had explained it to him, or hadn’t understood it, it’s a serious problem and it’s his problem». The royal expert then points out that «this stuff» that Harry and Meghan «present as “their truth”, is something that carries hundreds of millions in their pockets. So, it will be their truth as well but it is obviously a paid truth from a television platform who needs explosive materials to make plays. It is a truth that is convenient for those who commissioned the docuseries and for the two protagonists. In reality there is not a single word of truth in the things they say these two runaways. In their case, the expression is really to be taken in the literal sense».

– Harry and Meghan Markle, “they risk being booed at the coronation of Charles”

-Meghan Markle and the farce bow to Queen Elizabeth: it’s controversy

-Harry and Meghan, a story of love and money: how much they earn from the documentary and all other business