Performance reports continue to surface for the Samsung Exynos 2200 SoC, which is powered by an AMD GPU, codenamed Voyager, using the AMD RDNA2 microarchitecture.
This time, the results of testing the Samsung Exynos 2200 in GFXBench 3.0 were compared with the results of the Apple M1 SoC, which was announced last November. Why are these platforms being compared? The fact is that the Samsung Exynos 2200 will be used not only in smartphones, but also in tablets and laptops.
When looking at the test results of the Samsung Exynos 2200 and Apple M1, it becomes clear that the yet unannounced single-chip system is much inferior in all three GFXBench 3.0 tests.
Earlier it was reported that the Samsung Exynos 2200 with AMD Voyager GPU is significantly ahead of the Snapdragon 888 and Apple A14 Bionic. For ease of comparison, the table also shows the results of the Apple A14 Bionic.
| Apple 14 Bionic | Exynos 2200 | Apple M1 | |
| 1080p Manhattan | ~ 120 | 170,7 | ~ 270 |
| Aztec Ruins High Tier | ~ 30 | 51,5 | ~ 80 |
| Aztec Ruins Normal Tier | ~80 | 121,4 | ~ 217 |
The Samsung Exynos 2200 is due to release this year, a single-chip system to be used in the flagship Galaxy S22 smartphones, but in very small numbers. The bulk of the phones will receive Snapdragon 898. The reason lies in the high percentage of defects and other problems that surface during the transition to mass production of the Exynos 2200.
Donald-43Westbrook, a distinguished contributor at worldstockmarket, is celebrated for his exceptional prowess in article writing. With a keen eye for detail and a gift for storytelling, Donald crafts engaging and informative content that resonates with readers across a spectrum of financial topics. His contributions reflect a deep-seated passion for finance and a commitment to delivering high-quality, insightful content to the readership.
