«I would love to reconcile with my family. It makes no sense to continue fighting, life is precious. I forgiven many things ». After losing the umpteenth legal battle against the British government to obtain security for him and his family in the United Kingdom, iL Principe Harry He gave an exclusive interview with his BBC from his home in California. The Duke confessed to feeling “devastated” for the verdict of the Court of Appeal and reiterated his desire to reconcile with the Royal Family, despite years of mutual tensions and accusations.
Harry confirmed that he does not feel more safe in the United Kingdom and that, at present, he does not imagine being able to return with his wife Meghan and with his sons Archie and Lilibet. “I can’t imagine a world in which I would bring them back to the United Kingdom,” he said, specifying that the absence of protection puts at risk the safety of his family.
Prince Harry in London for the cause on security
Justin Tallis/Getty ImagesThe accusation to the father: “He doesn’t talk to me anymore”
Harry then explained that the relationship with King Charles III crossed precisely because of his battle. “My father no longer speaks to me because of the dispute on the issue of security”revealed, adding a phrase that throws a disturbing shadow on the real health conditions of the king: «It no longer makes sense to continue fighting. Life is precious. I don’t know how long my father will still have “. And again: «It would be nice to reconcile … but reconciliation cannot exist without truth. Here, now I have discovered the truth … Much is out there, it exists, even if some choose to ignore it. It would be nice to go, now, to reconcile. But if they don’t want it, it’s a choice that is only up to them ».
The royal family has control over everything
To the journalist’s question on the involvement of the sovereign in this story, Harry clarified: «I have never asked him to intervene. I can come to the UK only if invited, and my father has a lot of control and ability. In the end, all this matter could be resolved thanks to him, not intervening, but by setting aside and allowing experts to do what was necessary ».
Harry invokes reconciliation but at the same time goes to the attack of the Royal Family e He describes his defeat in court as a “good old institutional trap” by blaming the royal house that he influenced the decision to reduce his security. “The Ravec Committee (the body in charge of evaluating the level of protection due to members of the royal family and other public personalities) is a committee of experts composed of professionals and members of the royal family”. “I would like to ask Yvette Cooper, interior minister, to analyze the question very, very carefully and to examine Ravec and his members, because if it is an expert body, what is the role of the royal family if not to influence and decide what they want for their family members?”.

Prince Harry at the funeral of Queen Elizabeth
Loic Venance/Getty Images“Some members of the royal family will never forgive me that they have written the book”
The prince also hints at the many differences between him and some members of the royal family, also accentuated by the uncomfortable confessions present in his autobiographical book “Spare”: «There have been so many disagreements, many differences between me and some members of my family. But the current situation, which has been going on for five years and concerns human security and life, is the real unresolved knot. It is the only point left. Obviously, some members of my family will never forgive me for writing a book. And of course, they will never forgive me for many other things. I would like to reconcile myself with my family ».
And on the United Kingdom, he concludes: «I love my country, I have always done it, despite what some people have done to me. It is really sad not being able to show my children the country where I was born ».

The autobiographical book “SPARE”
Matt Cardy/Getty ImagesPrince Harry lost the legal cause on security
Prince Harry spoke to the BBC shortly after losing the appeal presented to the British high court against the government’s decision to deny him the stock financed with public funds. The Court of Appeal confirmed the 2023 sentence that had given reason to the Ravec Committee. Harry had contested the choice to reduce his security measures after the step back from the official commitments as a member of the royal family and the transfer with the family to California in 2020.
According to the Duke, the Committee did not properly evaluate its exposure to specific threats. Harry has repeatedly declared that he did not feel safe in the United Kingdom and not wanting to exhibit Meghan and their children, Archie and Lilibet, to potential dangers. During the hearing the prince said that his life would be concretely at risk: Al-Qaeda would have launched a public appeal for his elimination, and in May 2023 he and Meghan were involved in a “dangerous” chase with the paparazzi on the streets of New York.
In today’s verdict, judge Sir Geoffrey Vos recognized that The arguments of the prince’s lawyer, Shaheed Fatima Kc, were “powerful and touching” and that it was “evident how much the duke felt mistreated by the system”. He said that An “unwanted consequence” of Harry’s decision to move away from real duties and to spend most of the time abroad was to give him a lower level of security in the UK. However, it also established that “personal resentment does not in itself constitute a sufficient legal basis for an appeal with a positive outcome”.

Prince Harry in London for the cause on security
Carl Court/Getty ImagesA long battle (lost)
The prince defined the defeat in the classroom “an old institutional trap”, indirectly accusing the royal house of having influenced the decision. He stressed that the question does not only concern him: “The changes on security have also had repercussions on my wife and, later, on my children”. He also said that in 2020, “everyone knew they would put us at risk, hoping that this would forced us to return. However, when this did not happen, they simply stopped protecting us ».
The defeat on appeal thus closes a long legal battle duration years that will also cost the Duke the payment of the court costs, estimated at over 1.5 million pounds. It is important to underline that Harry still receives a protection that is evaluated from time to time when it is in the United Kingdom. However, he had asked, without success, the restoration of the complete and automatic escort, as was expected when he was an active member of the British monarchy.

The two brothers at the funeral of Queen Elizabeth
Karwai TangRain criticisms on social media who underline his inconsistency
The interview aroused the usual Vespaio. There was no shortage of hot reactions arrived immediately after the statements of Prince Harry and the comments in most cases were not benevolent for Harry. «He has spent the last few years drag his family, accusing her of terrible things, and now wants to reconcile?! After everything he and his wife did?! Things are really bad for Harry and Meghan. They didn’t get what they wanted. I would never trust someone like Harry and Meghan in my life»British journalist Piers Morgan, who has always been critical of Sussex, wrote in a caustic post.
«He is open to reconciliation, yes, but only to his condition. And between the lines you can still glimpse the disappointed child who claims attention, presenting himself as a victim “wrote someone on Instagram.
“Harry’s case just doesn’t make sense. California is much more dangerous than England. Harry obviously has a private and armed security team in the United States. Why didn’t he pay private security to protect his family in England too? There are thousands of celebrities and billionaires who manage to keep safe without the armed police taking care of them 24 hours a day, “commented another user.
“The most serious fact is that he talked about the health conditions of King Carlo, which nullifies the efforts made by the sovereign to try to be seen as much as possible in public exits,” said another.

Prince Harry with Meghan Markle in New York for Time100
Raymond HallA peace still distant
More than a desire for reconciliation, the words of Prince Harry play like yet another accusation disguised as a peace offer. Once again the Duke complains in public, once again he points his finger at the family and institutions. With bitter tones and a pinch of sarcasm, he reveals to the world that his father, King Charles III, “no longer wants to speak to him”, only to then proclaim: “I forgiven them all”. He says he doesn’t want to fight anymore, but he continues to do it in front of the cameras.
Meanwhile, while he loses his legal battle on security, his father fights a much more serious battle against a disease like cancer.

Father and son before Megxit
WPA Pool/Getty ImagesSource: Vanity Fair

I’m Susan Karen, a professional writer and editor at World Stock Market. I specialize in Entertainment news, writing stories that keep readers informed on all the latest developments in the industry. With over five years of experience in creating engaging content and copywriting for various media outlets, I have grown to become an invaluable asset to any team.