The war in Ukraine completes a year without an end apparently in sight. In addition to more than 300,000 deaths and injuries, products exported by the invaded country and Russia were also affected.
Commodities had a direct impact of the conflict. The smaller supply of oil, natural gas and grains caused a rise in the prices of food, energy and agricultural inputs, in the case of fertilizers, for example.
O The war paradox made companies linked to these sectors perform well and attract investors.
Now, a year later and some normalization of prices and product flow, is it worth investing in some sector linked to this conflict?
To help us answer this question, in The Great Debate-Investments this Monday (20), on the one hand, Pedro Medeiros, co-manager of Atalaya Capital, which defends energy commodities. On the other hand, Leonardo Alencar, head of Agro, Food and Beverage at XP, who prefers agricultural products.
“The Great Debate – Investing” There will always be the presence of two specialists with antagonistic views to discuss the pros and cons of the different options and investment solutions, in addition to topics from the world of personal finance and the financial market.
The attraction is weekly and airs on Mondays at 7:50 pm.
*Published by Ana Carolina Nunes and produced by Letícia Brito Silva
Source: CNN Brasil
I am an experienced journalist, writer, and editor with a passion for finance and business news. I have been working in the journalism field for over 6 years, covering a variety of topics from finance to technology. As an author at World Stock Market, I specialize in finance business-related topics.
