A former security guard has sued Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg and his wife Priscilla Chan saying that she had repeatedly suffered racist and sexist discrimination in her work. In the lawsuit she filed, she states that she was characterized by the nickname “ghetto”.
The employee, Mia King, claims that she started being abused immediately after she started working in 2018 at the company Limitless, which the couple had hired in the security sector.
According to the lawsuit, which was filed in a California court late last month, Her manager at the company, Liam Booth, who listened to duties under the direction of the couple, repeatedly stated that she was not qualified for her position and that she was hired only because she is a black woman. On several occasions, Booth also said that King’s hairstyle was “unprofessional” and referred to her and other blacks as a “ghetto”..
Toxic work environment after many homophobic and racist comments
Booth made a series of homophobic and racist statements that were not directed at King, but as the former employee said, made her work environment toxic. In one case, she claimed that Megan Markle had “contaminated the royal bloodline”.
In another example, Booth blamed Chan herself for a car accident, “while pulling his eyelids and commenting that Asian women are notoriously bad drivers.”
And a second case with a lawsuit by a former employee
King claims she has repeatedly complained about the issues, but has been told “men are in power” in the office. The woman was fired by Limitless in February 2019. Her lawsuit was filed on September 20 and was first reported by Insider on Tuesday.
The news website also reported that a second former security guard who is gay, filed a similar lawsuit against the couple for discrimination.
According to the report, Booth caressed him during an event at a sushi restaurant and once during a visit to the Zuckerberg property in Montana.
Zuckerberg and Chan are named in the lawsuits as employers who allegedly allowed discrimination.
The answer of Zuckerberg and Chan
In a statement, a spokesman for Zuckerberg and Chan’s “family office” said they were investigating the allegations when they first made them, but found them unsubstantiated.
“In this case, almost all the allegations in these complaints were first made through a lawyer, since both employees had left the company and in relation to significant monetary claims,” said Ben LaBolt.
“However, when their lawyers communicated these concerns, both the Human Resources Department and the external ombudsman conducted several weeks of separate investigations into the allegations, including conducting numerous interviews with colleagues and reviewing other relevant documents and information.” “After these thorough investigations, these allegations simply could not be substantiated. “We firmly believe that these workers were treated fairly and with respect.”
Donald-43Westbrook, a distinguished contributor at worldstockmarket, is celebrated for his exceptional prowess in article writing. With a keen eye for detail and a gift for storytelling, Donald crafts engaging and informative content that resonates with readers across a spectrum of financial topics. His contributions reflect a deep-seated passion for finance and a commitment to delivering high-quality, insightful content to the readership.
