Violetta Caprotti and the mystery of the lost diamond, a yellow destined to remain such

The case of Violetta Caprotti’s diamond It is destined to remain unsolved. The Milan prosecutor’s office has in fact filed the criminal investigation launched in 2022 by the firstborn and heir to Bernardo Caprotti, the founder of the supermarket chain Esselungaconcerning a ring received as a gift from his father in 2009. A platinum jewel that boasts, or boasted to say, a 13 carat diamond – del value about 3 million euros – and that has been the subject of an event that has a little of the mysterious. Not a simple theft, but a replacement which seems to have occurred as part of a modification requested by Caprotti herself. To those who, when, where: all non -clear elements, on which investigations have been made which, in the light of the latest updates, proved to be not very decisive.

To stay updated on the royalty, the celebrities, the shows and all the news from the world Vanity Fairsubscribe to ours Newsletter.

The story

The somewhat intricate history begins in 2022when Violetta Caprotti turns to the prestigious maison Cartier To make a change to the structure of the ring with diamond given to them by the father, or to widen the frame, however, realizing it (we do not know when) that the stone present on its ring was no longer the original one. His prestigious 13 -carat diamond turns out to be a zircon in realityalways very nice for heaven’s sake, but definitely less precious.

The complaint and the investigation then start: because if on the one hand it is necessary to discover where the original diamond is overOn the other hand, those who may have replaced it must also be revealed.

Kim Kardashian and the diamonds: first they steal them, then he loses them. Story of a (very) complicated relationship

In the last episode of The KardashiansKim Kardashian revealed that he had lost a precious diamond during the famous Ambani wedding. An accident that adds to a list of thefts and loss that is not a short time

So what happened to the diamond?

Total extraneousness to the alleged replacement of the stone by Cartier, who has shown that he received the ring with the stone considered “fake” and not with the original diamond, the prosecutor found himself in his hands a matassa difficult to unravel. Retracing the history of the jewel, which would seem to have even been the subject of a robbery suffered by the heir Esselunga In London by a waiter who several years earlier he would have subtracted some precious ones, an opportunity initially considered eligible for a probable replacement, and a previous estimate equal to 20 thousand euros of the Maison Cartier dating back to 2014, always relating to a request for modification, always requested by Caprotti and which no intervention had been followed, Those who investigated have come to the conclusion that the ring must have been delivered by the owner to third partiesprobably to an goldsmith who would have made the modification requested, but also replaced the stone.

Hopes that the case will be reopened, because it has now started to passionate about it, we launch a assist To the investigators: what if the father had actually been in reality the father, convinced of giving her a jewel of great importance?