Why Johnny Depp won and Amber Heard lost – What follows for the two stars after the much-praised trial

THE Johnny Depp and the Amber Heard They finally learned their fate on Wednesday after a scandalous defamation case that saw the unwashed on both sides come to light, with bomb testimonies detailing the abuse, drug use and violence during trial of six weeks.

After less than three days of consultation, jurors in favor of Depp, awarding him a total of $ 15 million in damages. Herd, meanwhile, achieved a small victory in her counterclaim, earning $ 2 million in damages but $ 0 in criminal damages. However, she is already planning her next step, as she plans to appeal.

Johnny Depp won the defamation bomb case against Aber Heard’s ex-wife because jurors ultimately did not believe he was telling the truth – especially during the hearing, legal experts told The Post on Wednesday.

Because Johnny Depp won and Amber Heard lost

“The case would rise and fall on its credibility more than any different legal issue. “And she just did not manage to get through the trial with her credibility intact.”

“The fact that she came out of the cross-examination substantially defeated without any credibility left her was the focus of the case for me,” said former California Judge Halim Dhanidina.

Dhanidina, who is also now a Los Angeles-based criminal defense attorney, said jurors probably believed that 36-year-old actor lied about the abuse he claimed he suffered from the 58-year-old protagonist of “Pirates of the Caribbean”.

The jurors finally believed: “She was lying about him [Ντεπ] on purpose. “And that, for me, is the conclusion of this trial,” Dhanidina said.

Beverly Hills’s lawyer Mitra Ahouraian, on the other hand, said the Aquaman actress may have also impressed jurors as dishonest in the chair.

The jury ruled that “either it was not authentic, or it was exaggerated, or it was not worthy of empathy,” said Ahouraian, whose clients include actors, directors and writers.

“Many of Herd’s emotional slogans in the witness chair did not match her testimony. “She became very passionate in strange moments or made awkward attempts to connect with the jurors by speaking directly to them.”

The fact that she failed to keep her story at certain points in the trial also hurt her case.said Ahouraian.

What follows for the two stars after the much-praised trial

Despite the jury’s decision, however, it is clear that the high-profile trial itself – which has captivated viewers and social media users throughout – will have undeniable impact on the careers of the two former rivalsregardless of the verdict.

As the two sides clashed in court, what emerged was something of a media circus, with Depp supporters – and what appeared to be a majority in the audience – to take the part of the actor and turn against Herd.

The drama and frenzy surrounding the trial – which was broadcast live to the public – will eventually spread outside the court, with fans launching campaigns in social mediato create memes and even fuel speculation about a love affair in court.

The overwhelming public support for Depp

The overwhelming support for him Dep He also appeared outside the courtroom, where a crowd of fans lined up holding placards and cheering on the movie star at the start of the trial every day.

And on Wednesday, as the news of the verdict was released, the fans went out on social media once again to celebrate and send messages of support to the star.

The trial has successfully cleared Depp’s name in the public eye, but it may not have had the same effect on his career..

What will happen to Depp’s career from now on

Crisis public relations expert Juda Engelmayer told Insider before the jury’s verdict on Wednesday that while the outcome of the trial could potentially revive Depp’s career, could have an impact on the types of roles offered to him in the future.

“I do not think it will be family friendly. “I think his role will be different,” he said. “They will choose him in independent films or in films where he may be the bad guy, a criminal, a mobster.” He also added that it is possible that Depp is now accepting roles as characters “who at first is not a likeable guy, not a fun guy, but someone who is bad”.

How the future of Amber Heard is erased

Regarding the Herdhowever, she is likely to find it more difficult to recover from the blow suffered by her reputation from the trial, which seems to have had a wider scope beyond her career.

The impact of the trial was already evident during the proceedings, when Depp’s supporters launched a Resolution calling on Warner Bros. to remove Herd from the role of Queen Day in the upcoming Aquaman 2 superhero moviewhich surpassed ta 4.4 million signatures while jurors were meeting.

The petition alleges that Herd was “exposed as a domestic criminal by Johnny Depp” during the multimillion-dollar litigation.

“In his lawsuit, Johnny Depp describes several cases of domestic abuse suffered by his (then) wife Amber Heard, including one where he was punched twice in the face and another where his finger was broken with a bottle of vodka and “he had to be surgically reattached,” the campaign said.

“He will bear the mark of it for the rest of his life.”

In court, jurors also heard testimony from Warner Bros. executives who revealed that the studio had to “build” the chemistry between Herd and the film’s protagonist. Jason Momoa during the remake of the first film.

Walter Hamada, president of DC-based film production Warner Bros. Pictures, testified that the role of the actress in the second film was not influenced “in any way” by what Johnny Depp said.

She acknowledged, however, that there was a delay of weeks in confirming that Herd would be taking part in Aquaman 2 due to “remake discussions” of her role.

Hamada said the issues arose as the filming of Aquaman’s first film was completed due to “chemistry” between Herd and Momoa.

Outside the courtroom, Herd also encountered vitriol from theviewers and members of the public who launched campaigns against her after seeing her case collapse in front of her during the trial.

THE Herd’s credibility suffered and saw viewers turn against her during a dramatic re-examination, during which she finally confirmed that she had not donated the $ 7 million of her divorce to a charity in its entirety, as she had claimed for years.

She also sparked further scrutiny when she claimed that her infamous post was not about Depp – a claim she seemed to refute several times during her deposition.

On social media, the #JusticeforJohnnyDepp became a trending hashtag along with #AmberHeardisapsychopath.

Tony Glen Silard, an associate professor at the Luiss Business School in Rome, commented on the phenomenon earlier this month, telling Forbes: “The Depp v. Herd trial is the latest example of how social media has become the new barometer of public opinion that builds or ruins careers.».