untitled design

Fedez with Travaglio in Muschio Selvaggio: when the guest takes over

To watch the entire episode of Wild Moss with protagonists Marco Travaglio and Daniele Capezzone makes you wonder if Fedez chose to attract the director of Everyday occurrence within his podcast for the sole purpose of talking about a signature of his newspaper that he has never had problems giving him in the past years: Selvaggia Lucarelli. Although the guest starts from a certain way of approaching journalism and offers some very interesting ideas on what can be considered real news nowadays, at a certain point the discussion veers towards a different turn. It is Fedez himself, in fact, who questions his guests on the, in his opinion, disproportionate relevance towards his wife Chiara Ferragni and the Balocco case, which, from serving as an example, ends up becoming the starting point towards the true hidden core of the entire episode, that is, judging the work of Selvaggia Lucarelli.

Without going into the merits of the matter, given that everyone is completely free to have an opinion on the most just and appropriate means to resort to in pursuit of the truth, the most strange thing is the fact that Fedez asks Marco Travaglio to account for Lucarelli's modus operandi as if he were absolutely responsible for her. Travaglio, certainly not the first to pass, rightly defends his signature by explaining on several occasions something that is also obvious to fans of Fedez and Wild Mossor that it's a little alienating to talk about the absent. Fedez, in his defense, says he invited Lucarelli and received a no as an answer, but can this renunciation justify the fact of having invited the director of Done to talk about her and, perhaps, to corner her?

The obvious problem, however, is another: through a good dialectic which, beyond personal likes and dislikes, must still be recognized, Travaglio easily gets the better of Fedez demonstrating that, in certain cases, guests have more resources than the leader. In defending Lucarelli during a debate which, pace Capezzone, focused almost exclusively on him and his newspaper, At a certain point, Travaglio couldn't take it anymoreinsisting on the fact that it was not right for him to respond on Selvaggia's behalf and adding that Fedez's obstinacy towards him is linked to the quotation mark that we have seen repeated in the newspapers in the last 24 hours, that is, that Lucarelli would have managed to transform Chiara Ferragni into Wanna Marchi. A sentence that Fedez lets fall into the void, also because it is in front of a guest who is evidently upset and anxious to get up from that table. In general it would be appropriate to remember that it is good for those who host a podcast or TV program to make an effort to make those who speak in their space feel at ease. And it is good that the two have the same preparation on the same topics in order not to create one-sided communication which risks turning into more of a showdown rather than an informative episode for everyone.

Source: Vanity Fair

You may also like

Get the latest

Stay Informed: Get the Latest Updates and Insights

 

Most popular