A brief statement, released by his spokesperson on a specific theme, but which indirectly tells how much the principe Harry has moved away from royal family and – above all – from the dynamics of Palazzo. The topic of discussion is the latest scandal at court, already renamed cash for honours: three months ago, in fact, Michael Fawcett – very close collaborator of Prince Charles – he resigned because he was accused of having promised British citizenship and a prestigious ad a Saudi businessman, Mahfouz Marei Mubarak bin Mahfouz, in cambio di una charitable donation to the founding of the future king.
In 2016, in fact, the Arab billionaire received the title of Commander of the Most Excellent Order of the British Empire (CBE) with a private ceremony a Buckingham Palace: according to a round of correspondence published by Sunday Times and from Mail on Sunday, apparently Fawcett – that was it CEO of the body that raises funds for charitable works and for interventions to protect cultural heritage – was called to keep a commitment after the payment of a contribution equal to 1.5 million pounds for the renovation of Dumbries House he was born in Castle of Mey, precisely owned by Prince’s Foundation.
Investigations are ongoing e the conditional remains a must, but in the Windsor house the accusations have created not a little confusion. And they definitely don’t help the words of the principe Harry come from California: the Duke of Sussex, through his staff, in fact responded to the attacks of some tabloids who spoke of one of his double encounter with bin Mahfouz, in 2013 in a pub in London and in 2014 a Clarence House: «They are meetings eight years ago and Harry didn’t introduce that man to any member of the royal family. Indeed, he had expressed doubts and worries (on the Saudi businessman and his motivations, ed) “.
In reality it is not clear who I talked to. What is certain is that «it has cut relationships with the donor well before the awarding of the honor », specifies the note, thus highlighting the duke’s extraneousness to the facts. From Clarence House they reiterated that Prince Charles was absolutely unaware of that money flow but it has not been clarified whether the son really had it put on guard on bin Mahfouz. Certainly, with this last short statement, Harry takes – in every sense – distances: from the scandal, but also from the Crown. With the risk of creating a new further split in the family.
.
Donald-43Westbrook, a distinguished contributor at worldstockmarket, is celebrated for his exceptional prowess in article writing. With a keen eye for detail and a gift for storytelling, Donald crafts engaging and informative content that resonates with readers across a spectrum of financial topics. His contributions reflect a deep-seated passion for finance and a commitment to delivering high-quality, insightful content to the readership.
